Editorial Standards
Factum Immigration follows these standards so readers can judge our reporting.
- Sourcing. Every article is built from named, verifiable sources — government agencies and courts, established news organizations, and legal and advocacy groups. We attribute claims to the source that makes them.
- Corroboration. We publish a news story only when the development is reported by multiple independent sources. Single-source items are held until they are corroborated.
- AI-assisted production. Our articles are drafted with the assistance of AI language models and then checked against their sources by an automated factuality review before publication. Statements that the sources do not support are removed; pieces that cannot be verified are held for human review rather than published.
- Neutrality. We report developments and attribute contested claims to whoever makes them. We do not take sides and we do not use advocacy language.
- No legal advice. We report on immigration law and policy. We do not provide legal advice or individualized guidance. Every article carries this notice.
- Corrections. Found an error? Select the text and press Ctrl+Enter, or email info@factum.media. We correct confirmed errors promptly and note significant corrections.
- Independence. Our editorial decisions are independent of advertisers and sponsors.